Issue StoriesBe Informativeby Dana S. Green I am seeing more HME provider spokespersons quoted in print stating that reductions in service levels will be their answer to reduced fees. I am wondering if this is troubling others in the provider community. When were we given permission to reduce the level of service? I understand that those spokespersons may intend to say that cost reductions are necessary for the future of their businesses. There is nothing wrong with that. But when I hear that service levels are being reduced, I am concerned about the message being given to medical professionals and consumers, not to mention third-party payors. Publicly stating that we are at liberty to determine service levelsquality of care to everyone elseis not in our best interest and, in fact, is not true. Our industry is, after all, dependent upon adhering to standards that have been set primarily by health professionals. This fact is the underpinning for our industrys significance and integrity, and it also justifies our fees. The featured letter is our companys response to the insurance company desiring to purchase our equipment (see letter). If quality of care were negotiable or determined by anyone other than the patients physician, this approach would undoubtedly be less successful than it has turned out to be for my company. As it stands right now, the physician, consumer, and even the insurance industry expect the highest possible level of service. Who wants to tell them it is our intention to provide less?
Dana S. Green is president of Oxygen Support Systems, a home respiratory care company based in Cherry Hill, NJ. He can be reached at (856) 765-0900. |
|
|
Featured Jobs
Find a Job |
ADDITIONAL ONLINE RESOURCES |
Featured Employer
|