Issue StoriesUnexplained Dyspnea May Indicate Pulmonary Embolismby Bill Pruitt, RRT, CPFT, AE-C Pulmonary embolism can be a life-threatening event and has been estimated to occur at a rate of about 69 cases per 100,000 people.
Risk and Diagnosis Stasis can occur with such medical conditions as congestive heart failure, dehydration, or shock. Stasis can also result from prolonged immobilization, as seen in patients who are bedridden or in relatively healthy people who travel long distances.1 Although traveling carries a relatively low rate of massive PE, the risk increases substantially for flights of more than 4,800 km; for air passengers older than 50 years of age; and for anyone flying who has a history of previous VTE, cancer, large varicose veins, limited mobility, or thrombophilia.6 Hypercoagulable states occur with cancer, antithrombin deficiency, mutations in various factors found in the clotting cascade, sickle cell anemia, and other deficiencies or abnormalities of blood components.1 Injury or abnormality in the intima is found in cases of trauma, in patients who have had major surgery, and in smokers.1,7 When thromboembolism occurs in the lung, the clot often originates in the deep veins in the lower extremities. The clot travels through the venous system to the right heart; it is then pumped into the pulmonary artery, where it travels out into the pulmonary circulation until it lodges in the arterial system and stops blood flow. Pulmonary embolism caused by fat occurs in patients with long-bone fractures, sickle cell disease, or pancreatitis, as well as in those who have undergone orthopedic surgical procedures (which may release fat from the bone marrow into the circulatory system).3 Regardless of the cause, PE due to fat embolism is usually asymptomatic. Between 1% and 20% of patients with long-bone fractures may, however, experience fat embolism syndrome, with signs and symptoms related to decreased blood flow to the lungs, brain, and skin.8 These patients usually exhibit hypoxemia, neurological abnormalities (ranging from drowsiness to confusion to coma), and a rash (usually on the conjunctivae, oral mucous membranes, and the skin folds of the neck and axillae).3,8 Orthopedic surgery also contributes to the incidence of thromboembolism due to the formation of clots, both during surgery and after surgery as a result of stasis; the postsurgical patient tends to remain immobile because movement causes pain, and the use of analgesics to relieve pain may also contribute to immobility. In 2003, Mantilla et al9 reported that, over the 10-year period ending December 31, 1995, 116 of 9,791 patients undergoing primary elective total hip or knee replacement surgery had PE due to blood clots or DVT, diagnosed within 30 days of the surgical procedure. This occurred despite the use of routine prophylactic anticoagulation, although anticoagulation was found to decrease the incidence significantly. Tapson,5 writing in 2004, stated, Unfortunately, history and physical examination are notoriously insensitive and nonspecific for both DVT and PE. Patients with lower extremity venous thrombosis often do not exhibit erythema, warmth, pain, swelling, or tenderness. On the other hand, if enough of the pulmonary system is affected, the patient may experience the sudden onset of dyspnea, chest pain, and/or tachycardia. In young, healthy patients, the signs and symptoms of PE may be slight and attributed to other causes, thus leading to a delay in diagnosis and treatment. Increased age brings added risk of pulmonary embolism but adds confusion to the diagnostic process due to possible concurrent illnesses, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, or congestive heart failure. A quick, seven-item scoring system (see Table)13 is one of the tools used to help screen a patient for PE based on the clinical presentation.
In the past, ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scans were diagnostic tools used most frequently to evaluate PE. While a normal V/Q scan will rule out PE, many scans are indeterminate. Pulmonary angiography has been the recognized gold standard for evaluating PE, but, due to potential complications related to this procedure, it is rarely used. Specialized CT scanning is becoming more common for evaluating pulmonary embolism. With its high degree of sensitivity and specificity, CT may be at the point of replacing both V/Q scans and pulmonary angiography.10 Diagnosis of PE involves a mixture of supportive clinical findings and positive tests, along with ruling out other possible causes of the patients illness. Pulmonary embolism results in an abnormal chest radiograph about 80% of the time, and the electrocardiogram shows nonspecific abnormalities in 70% to 75% of cases. The ECG is more helpful in ruling out other problems such as myocardial infarction, but a large PE may reflect a right bundle branch block and T-wave inversion in leads V1 through V4, and lead III may have both Q waves and inverted T waves.6 PE will increase alveolar dead space by increasing areas having ventilation but no perfusion. In addition, there may be a widening of the alveolar-arterial oxygen tension gradient, known as the P(a-a)o2 gradient. As a result, mild hypoxemia may occur in older patients. On the other hand, younger patients may have relatively normal Pao2, unless there is a significant increase in dead space.The D-dimer blood test (which measures the by-products of thrombin and plasmin) is considered good for ruling out DVT and pulmonary embolism. Ultrasound examination of the extremities has been shown to give good diagnostic evidence for many patients, but it falters when screening asymptomatic patients who are at high risk.1 Echocardiography revealing right ventricular dilation and hypokinesis has been useful in diagnosing acute pulmonary embolism, but these findings are unreliable in patients with underlying cardiopulmonary disease, such as COPD.5 Prevention Preoperative care should include prophylactic anticoagulation; early ambulation, combined with continued anticoagulation in postoperative care helps reduce the risks of DVT and pulmonary embolism for surgical patients. Treatment High-risk patients who exhibit signs of acute pulmonary embolism or who are in cardiogenic shock will often be given a thrombolytic medication. Unlike heparin and warfarin, which prevent clots from forming but do not affect clots already present, thrombolytic medications actually dissolve clots. In 1977, the US Food and Drug Administration approved streptokinase to fight pulmonary embolism. Urokinase was approved in 1978, followed by alteplase in 1990. Although hemorrhage is a risk when thrombolytics are used, the benefits of restoring blood flow outweigh the risk of excessive bleeding, considering the damage done by leaving the blockage in place.12 Supplemental oxygen is needed to reduce hypoxemia in patients with pulmonary embolism and, for those who exhibit hypotension and shock, fluid resuscitation and vasopressors should be started immediately.1 Conclusion
References |
|
|
Featured Jobs
Find a Job |
ADDITIONAL ONLINE RESOURCES |
Featured Employer
|